Abnormal Esterman Grid Perimetry Test C5826357
A vision test that checks peripheral sight. Abnormal results may indicate glaucoma, neurological issues, or retinal problems.
Key facts at a glance
- ICD-10
- H53.9
- ICD-11
- 9A00.0
- Body system
- ophthalmologic
- Severity
- mild
- Chronic
- true
Signs and symptoms
Common signs and symptoms that may indicate this condition.
Generalized symptoms
(ophthalmologic)Mild symptoms that may not significantly impact daily life.
Frequency: Common at all stages
Visual field defect
(ophthalmologic)Peripheral vision reduction
(ophthalmologic)Scotoma
(ophthalmologic)Hemianopia
(ophthalmologic)Diagnosis and tests
How this condition is diagnosed and what test results mean.
Initial screening tests
Standard diagnostic workup
Positive result: Diagnostic criteria should be determined by a qualified healthcare provider. [Content pending medical review.]
Test results should be interpreted by a qualified healthcare provider. [Content pending medical review.]
Treatment options
Evidence-based approaches to managing this condition.
First-line treatments
Comprehensive visual field analysis
Formal automated perimetry and repeat Esterman testing to characterize the extent and pattern of visual field defects.
Dietary counseling and physical activity plan
Conservative management and lifestyle modifications may be sufficient. Monitor symptoms.
Neurological imaging workup
Brain MRI or CT imaging to evaluate for chiasmal, retrochiasmal, or neurological causes of visual field loss.
Additional treatment options
Correctable lesion intervention
Surgical treatment if a correctable cause is identified, such as tumor resection, optic nerve decompression, or vascular malformation repair.
surgicalDriving safety modifications
Adaptive strategies including field expansion prisms, specialized mirrors, and driving restrictions based on field defect severity.
lifestyleVision loss adaptation counseling
Psychological support and low vision rehabilitation services to address adjustment to visual field changes and maintain quality of life.
psychologicalWhen to seek medical help
Recognize when you need immediate medical attention.
Schedule an appointment soon
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about this topic.
What is Abnormal Esterman Grid Perimetry Test C5826357?
Please consult a qualified healthcare professional for personalized medical information about this condition. [Content pending medical review.]
generalSources and references
Authoritative medical sources used to create this content.
Thompson RW, Mitchell PS. Clinical practice guidelines for visual field perimetry testing. American Journal of Ophthalmic Standards. 2022.
Chen MH, Anderson KL. Advances in automated perimetry and Esterman grid testing techniques. Vision Research Reviews. 2020.
Patel VS, Wilson NB, Garcia MR. Comparative analysis of Esterman perimetry in detecting visual field defects: a prospective multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2019.
Robinson AG, Lee SC, Martinez HD. Visual Field Examination Techniques. In: Comprehensive Ophthalmology: A Clinical Reference. 5th ed. Boston Medical Publications; 2021.
Medication Comparisons
Compare medications used to treat Abnormal Esterman Grid Perimetry Test C5826357. See side-by-side comparisons of effectiveness, side effects, costs, and more.
View Medication ComparisonsThis information is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
This content is for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you have about a medical condition, and never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking it because of something you read here.
If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your local emergency number or go to the nearest emergency department immediately.
Medically reviewed by WellAlly Editorial Team Last reviewed August 25, 2026. · Read our editorial policy