Diet quality and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes
Meng Y, Sharma D, Liu R
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · 2019
This meta-analysis evaluates the intervention under study in relation to the primary clinical outcome. Includes 4,367 participants. Evidence level: Ia.
循证研究：饮食质量与血糖控制
Key facts at a glance
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.039
- PMID
- 30922462
- Journal
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Year
- 2019
- Study type
- meta-analysis
- Evidence level
- Ia
- Sample size
- 4367
- Intervention
- 高饮食质量 vs 低饮食质量
- Primary outcome
- HbA1c 变化
- Open access
- false
Study Overview
This meta-analysis enrolled 4,367 participants and examined the primary clinical outcome.
Key Findings
Results regarding the primary clinical outcome are presented.
Clinical Conclusions
See original publication for detailed findings. Evidence level: Ia.
Abstract
"This meta-analysis enrolled 4,367 participants, investigating the effects of 高饮食质量 vs 低饮食质量 on HbA1c 变化.
This information is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
This content is for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you have about a medical condition, and never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking it because of something you read here.
If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your local emergency number or go to the nearest emergency department immediately.
Medically reviewed by WellAlly Editorial Team Last reviewed October 18, 2026. · Read our editorial policy