Iron deficiency and child neurodevelopment
Lozoff B, Beard J, Connor J
NEJM · 2017
This meta-analysis evaluates the intervention under study in relation to the primary clinical outcome. Includes 5,678 participants. Evidence level: IIa.
循证研究：铁缺乏与儿童神经发育
Key facts at a glance
- DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMra1803860
- PMID
- 30136947
- Journal
- NEJM
- Year
- 2017
- Study type
- meta-analysis
- Evidence level
- IIa
- Sample size
- 5678
- Intervention
- 铁剂补充 vs 安慰剂
- Primary outcome
- 神经发育评分
- Open access
- false
Study Overview
This meta-analysis enrolled 5,678 participants and examined the primary clinical outcome.
Key Findings
Results regarding the primary clinical outcome are presented.
Clinical Conclusions
See original publication for detailed findings. Evidence level: IIa.
Abstract
"This meta-analysis enrolled 5,678 participants, investigating the effects of 铁剂补充 vs 安慰剂 on 神经发育评分.
This information is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
This content is for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you have about a medical condition, and never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking it because of something you read here.
If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your local emergency number or go to the nearest emergency department immediately.
Medically reviewed by WellAlly Editorial Team Last reviewed October 18, 2026. · Read our editorial policy