High ratio massive transfusion in trauma
Meyer DE, Cotton BA, Michelet P
JAMA Surgery · 2019
This meta-analysis evaluates the intervention under study in relation to the primary clinical outcome. Includes 8,965 participants. Evidence level: IIa.
Evidence-Based Research: Massive Transfusion Protocol Trauma
Key facts at a glance
- DOI
- 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0097
- PMID
- 31369239
- Journal
- JAMA Surgery
- Year
- 2019
- Study type
- meta-analysis
- Evidence level
- IIa
- Sample size
- 8965
- Intervention
- 高比例输血 (FFP:PLT:RBC=1:1:1) vs 低比例
- Primary outcome
- 24h 和 30天死亡率
- Open access
- false
Study Overview
This meta-analysis enrolled 8,965 participants and examined the primary clinical outcome.
Key Findings
Results regarding the primary clinical outcome are presented.
Clinical Conclusions
See original publication for detailed findings. Evidence level: IIa.
Abstract
"This meta-analysis enrolled 8,965 participants, investigating the effects of 高比例输血 (FFP:PLT:RBC=1:1:1) vs 低比例 on 24h 和 30天死亡率.
This information is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
This content is for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you have about a medical condition, and never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking it because of something you read here.
If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your local emergency number or go to the nearest emergency department immediately.
Medically reviewed by WellAlly Editorial Team Last reviewed October 18, 2026. · Read our editorial policy